Part one required me to conduct a brainwave recording baseline using a 19-channel, FDA-cleared, electroencephalograph (EEG) that my company built. Once the baseline was collected, we called the person's phone and had them hold it up to their ear for 5 minutes. 

Then we took away the phone and collected another EEG. Now we had one recorded baseline and another with cell phone exposure to conduct a comparison.

Then we called the person's phone one more time and had them hold it up to their ear for another five minutes. This time, however, we had an Aires Tech protection device attached to the phone. After five minutes, we ended the call, took away the phone, and collected another EEG. I conducted a comparative analysis of the data using a software called EEGLAB, which was developed at the Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience at UC San Diego.

I was surprised by what I observed. From the baseline recording to the first exposure, the brain appeared to respond by generating more high beta and gamma wave activity. This suggested fast wave activation and is what we would see when the brain was “irritated” or inflamed. I was expecting to see even more high beta and gamma activity after the second “exposure,” but the opposite was observed. High beta and gamma activity reduced back down to normal levels of absolute power. Had I not conducted the experiment myself, I would have remained very skeptical about this observation. But I conducted the study, and I was able to verify that it was done correctly from beginning to end.

The only difference was the presence of the Aires Tech device on the phone. Something changed that mitigated the EMF. It is reasonable to suggest that Aires Tech’s device was responsible for this outcome. Over time, I would end up conducting the same experiment with many different people. The outcomes appear to be consistent. We have expanded the “test” to include event-related potentials, which are another kind of brainwave scan that is more precise and informative.

Lastly, we have been measuring cardiac responses as well, which have suggested the Aires Tech device has a calming effect on the autonomic nervous system. Plans are now being discussed to conduct this study in a controlled environment with a larger group of subjects to examine this phenomenon more closely. In my opinion, something is happening that has a stabilizing impact on the brain and the heart. If this is the case, then we need to understand it better. The implications for health and wellness in the digital age are extremely important to examine, as humans will continue to be exposed to EMF. Developing good, safe mitigation strategies is of the utmost importance.